What does EBIDTA mean?
EBITDA (short for Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortisation) is one of the go-to numbers dealmakers reach for when a company is being valued for a sale of shares, merger, acquisition, or investment.
Why is EBITDA so important for M&A?
EBITDA strips out factors that can blur the underlying performance of the business (like how it’s financed, its tax position, or non-cash accounting charges) and creates a more comparable “apples-to-apples” baseline across companies and industries.
EBITDA is not spelt out in statutory accounts, which your accountant will provide you in the ordinary course of work, where operating profit is more common. However, it’s not difficult to work it out: start with operating profit and add back depreciation and amortisation, then factor in interest and tax so you arrive at a clearer view of earnings from core operations.
To that extent, it is an objective baseline and has become the default method of arriving at value ahead of other measures, such as those based on revenue or cash flow.
It is important to stress that it is not a perfect proxy for cash, because EBITDA reflects what the business generates before it reinvests in things like capital expenditure or new initiatives. Even so, it serves as a helpful reference point for buyers.
For example, if a business reports £2.5 million of EBITDA, a buyer might view that as an indicator of the business’s ability to generate around £2.5 million a year in steady-state cash over the long term, before allowing for the ongoing spend on capex, upgrades, and other reinvestment needed to maintain and grow the operation.
For any business planning to sell or attract investment, calculating EBITDA is therefore a valuable exercise. It allows owners to view the business through the eyes of a prospective buyer or investor.
What is the difference between EBITDA and EBIT?
Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) is a widely used measure of a company’s operating profitability. As the name implies, it shows profit before the impact of financing costs and taxation. While interest and taxes are very real cash expenses, they don’t arise from the day-to-day trading of the business itself. By removing these items, EBIT helps isolate how well the core operations are performing, independent of how the business is funded or where it sits in the tax system.
Both EBIT and EBITDA are used to assess the profitability of a company’s core operations, but they differ in how much of the cost structure they capture. EBIT deducts depreciation and amortisation from profit, while EBITDA adds these items back. Although depreciation and amortisation are non-cash expenses, they relate to the wear, tear, or consumption of the company’s assets over time. As a result, EBIT reflects operating profitability after recognising these asset-related costs, whereas EBITDA focuses more narrowly on earnings generated before such charges, highlighting the cash-generating potential of the business from its day-to-day operations.
Nevertheless, most transactions will use EBITDA as the relevant value.
When does a seller need to know their EBITDA?
It’s a concept that any seller needs to get to grips with and properly understand right at the outset of the process.
What does adjusted EBITDA mean?
For many owners who have always measured performance using operating profit, a valuation based on EBITDA (and especially adjusted EBITDA) can be a bit of an eye-opener. The most common examples revolve around owner-managed “flexibility” that may not continue after a sale or investment.
For example, an owner might legitimately take higher drawings or split income between salary and dividends. That’s perfectly normal in an owner-managed business, but it may not reflect the cost structure a buyer expects post-deal, particularly if the owner steps back or remuneration is put onto a more formal, market-based footing. In those circumstances, adjusting EBITDA to reflect a sustainable, forward-looking position is often entirely reasonable.
The same logic applies elsewhere: rent may be set above or below market level where the property is owned by the business owner (or a connected person), or the business may benefit from “friendly” pricing from connected-party suppliers. Adjusted EBITDA is designed to identify and normalise these kinds of items, so the figure better reflects how the business is likely to perform under new ownership.
In the experience of our M&A team, most SME owners will have at least some costs running through the business, which may be modest or more significant. It’s their company, after all, and they often have the flexibility to structure things in a way that suits them. The important point in a sale is that a buyer will usually assume some of those owner-specific costs won’t continue once the business changes hands. That said, under today’s tax regime, it’s increasingly common for sellers to use various approaches to how they pay themselves to achieve tax optimisation.
Significance of EBITDA in distressed M&A
In distressed M&A, EBITDA still plays an important role, but it has to be treated with caution.
Distressed businesses often show weak, volatile, or even negative EBITDA, usually because they are burdened by excessive debt, short-term liquidity pressure, or one-off shocks rather than a fundamentally broken operating model. Buyers, therefore, look beyond EBITDA headlines to understand what the business could generate once the distress is removed. For example, after a debt restructure, cost rationalisation, or disposal of loss-making divisions.
Therefore, EBITDA is best viewed as one tool among many: useful for understanding underlying operating potential, but only when combined with a clear analysis of liquidity, capital expenditure needs, and the steps required to stabilise the business after completion.
The next step after understanding EBITDA: Applying Multiples
One of the first questions business owners ask when thinking about a sale is a simple one: “What multiple will my business achieve?” It’s an understandable question, but also one that rarely has a simple answer.
There’s a long-standing myth, often repeated in textbooks and casual conversations, that there is a “standard” EBITDA multiple: usually four or five times. Like many myths, there’s a grain of truth in it. If you look across the market, you might see an average emerge around that level.
But averages can be misleading. A more helpful way to think about multiples is as a bell curve: some businesses sit at the lower end, many cluster around the middle, and others achieve significantly higher multiples. Where a business falls on that curve depends heavily on its industry and sector.
At its core, an EBITDA multiple reflects how much a buyer is willing to pay today for a stream of future earnings. In some industries, a buyer may be comfortable paying the equivalent of five years’ worth of EBITDA because cash flows are steady, predictable, and the risks are well understood. In other sectors, the same buyer might see far greater upside and be prepared to pay far more for it.
Take, for example, a software business with strong IP and genuine economies of scale. If that intellectual property can generate recurring revenues for 15 or 20 years, and growth can be delivered without costs rising at the same pace, a buyer may be willing to pay a multiple well above the market average in tech M&A. In that context, the multiple reflects future upside, the durability of earnings, and strategic value, rather than simply what the business has achieved historically.
The key takeaway is that EBITDA multiples are not universal. They are shaped by sector dynamics, growth prospects, risk profile, and how sustainable and scalable the earnings are perceived to be. Understanding where your business sits within its industry, and how buyers in that sector think about value, is far more important than chasing a headline “magic number.
