NDA with Contractors – Better Safe Than Sorry

Hiring independent professionals, i.e., contractors for various projects or the provision of professional services seem like the best business model recently, especially in the IT industry. The reasons for establishing such cooperation are various, both for the clients and the contractor. Still, in comparison to the traditional ones, this type of business relationship can bear additional risks, and one of those risks is leaking confidential information about the client’s company.

Individuals who provide services to companies without establishing an employment relationship with them are often called contractors. There is no literal translation of this word into Serbian, so in practice, you may often hear terms such as “service provider” or “contractor”. In order to prevent any misunderstandings with this linguistic ambiguousness, in this blog, the contractor is an independent individual who provides services, whether they are officially registered at the Serbian Business Registers Agency as an entrepreneur, or whether they offer services as natural persons(colloquially known as freelancers).

Lately (for various reasons), the term freelancer is brought up in the public more often, although, in tech-savvy circles, this kind of work engagement is known for a long time, and is even more dominant than the traditional employment relationship. The reason for this is the sudden development of tech businesses in the Serbian market, as well as the rapid increase in the number of independent IT professionals (caused by the aforementioned development). As a result, we often see that besides formally employed individuals, there are a number of independent developers hired for certain projects or provision of particular services who are also working for the same company.

Same as with any other form of business cooperation, the relationship between the company and the independent contractor hired to work on particular projects is twofold, so its benefits and drawbacks can be looked at from two angles.

• By engaging contractors, IT companies can drastically increase their productivity and profit, since they achieve the most desirable effect by hiring independent IT professionals: new products and services are created and placed on the market but in a less costly and more efficient manner. The benefit, in comparison to establishing an employment agreement, is that the client does not have any financial obligations as they do with employees, such as payment of taxes and contributions, securing a place and means for work, payment of reimbursement for leave from work, and other things, which significantly reduce the operational expenses.
• On the other hand, the contractor is more flexible since it is hired by multiple different clients, it is not “bound” to one company. This allows them to do business with multiple companies simultaneously. Those companies can even be each other’s competitors (in which case, one should pay attention to the possible non-compete clause). Since, from the legal point of view, the contractor is often a registered entrepreneur, they can always perform their business activities independently, without acquiring the status of a formally employed individual.

In addition, contractors are not obliged to provide their services to one company only, which leads us to the question: what stops the hired independent contractor from disclosing client’s confidential information to third parties, and compromising their whole business?

We have already covered the topic of the importance of NDAs, but this time, we are highlighting another scenario, where an all-encompassing NDA concluded promptly will provide you with adequate protection and prevent various risks and dangers in which your company may end up.

Since the introduction of the so-called independent contractor test, the expert community often brings up the criteria that are used to determine whether a natural person that works for a certain company is an independent entrepreneur who makes a profit from conducting business individually, in regards to the Personal Income Tax Law, or whether they are a de facto employee.

We have already written about the differences which the Tax Administration takes into account when conducting the test, but when it comes to concluding NDAs, they are formulated a bit differently. Thus, we are highlighting only a few of the most important differences between contractors and employees which are evident when this relationship is looked at from the aspect of confidentiality and protection of trade secrets.

Irrespective of the differences listed above, you should keep in mind the Law on Trade Secret Protection, which includes:

• commercial information,
• the information which is not generally known or available to third parties who could realize economic benefit by using it,
• information protected by adequate measures by the disclosing party,
• the information which, if disclosed, could cause damage.

Since the basis for keeping a trade secret defined in this way is a legal regulation, the obligation of confidentiality exists no matter the relationship between the individuals amongst whom the confidential information is transferred, so both relations that we mentioned above –the relation between client and contractor and the relation between the employer and employee – are covered with the abovementioned law. However, since the list of confidential information often significantly surpasses the framework of legal definitions of trade secrets, it would be wrong to assume that only by relying on the law, without concluding an NDA, the company’s confidential information is protected enough.

It is not difficult to conclude that, despite the numerous similarities between employees and independent contractors, their differences are the key thing one should pay attention to when drafting an NDA with either of the two. The contractor’s independence can sometimes make the start of business cooperation and regulation of all related matters easier, while sometimes, the contractor’s freedom may represent an additional concern for the company. Still, when establishing an employment relationship, one should take into account the nature of the cooperation, and be careful not to make some of the most common mistakes when drafting an NDA with employees.

• If the definition of the information protected by the NDA does not encompass your source code, you are automatically losing the right to any type of protection, should the code be unlawfully revealed. So, don’t forget to include source code in the definition of confidential information (and all other information that might be disclosed!)
• Define the usage of confidential information that is allowed as precisely as possible. For example, if the contractor is hired to test software and track bugs, it is necessary to unambiguously foresee within the NDA that the usage of code that gets into the contractor’s hands during those tasks is limited only to those particular tasks, i.e., services. Everything besides that would represent a violation of confidentiality.
• It is also useful to foresee that keeping or multiplying the code is prohibited. Having in mind that the code is kept in electronic form, it can easily “fall victim” to the misuse of software and code, through numerous ways of unlawful handling, and your primary task is to stop that from happening.
• Returning all confidential information after the tasks for which the contractor was engaged is finalized – this step is crucial when it comes to confidentiality protection, and it is often forgotten in practice. So, don’t forget to foresee in your NDA the contractor’s obligation to return all information that they have acquired while working for you.

All of the warnings we’ve listed are equally important no matter what your confidential information consists of. So, it doesn’t matter whether you are sharing a source code with the contractor or whether you give them access to the company’s financial information: if the disclosure of such information can cause damage to you, do the right thing for your trade secrets, and conclude an NDA with your contractors.

One of the key reasons why it is necessary to formalize the business relationship with the contractor through a written agreement is to state that the contractor is hired exactly in that status- only as a contractor. This emphasizes the fact that the contractor is not employed by the employer, which removes any doubts in that regard.

The services that are expected from the contractor, besides being the central part of the agreement, have to be described in detail since, in order to perform those tasks, subcontractors are often hired. With the increased number of people working on the project, the danger of data “leaking” also increases, so the agreement has to encompass all potential individuals to whom the confidential information might be disclosed, in order to adequately define the obligation of confidentiality.

It is clear that compensation and provision of services are the main reason why the agreement is concluded in the first place, and without those elements, the agreement wouldn’t make any sense. Although these elements are not directly connected to data confidentiality, their violation in most cases leads to the termination of the agreement, which immediately activates the provision on confidentiality.

The non-compete clause is closely related to confidentiality since it is another effective mechanism that can raise the client’s level of protection. In essence, the more precisely you define with whom your contractor can cooperate while working for you, the more successful your goal to keep the confidentiality of important information will be.

No matter whether the agreement is terminated or expired, or whether the obligations which were agreed upon were fulfilled, it is important to state the consequences in case the agreement is ceased. It is extremely important to include the clause on confidentiality within the agreement with the contractor (and also within the separate NDA), and foresee that even in case the agreement is not in force, the confidentiality clause shall remain in force. This way you can be sure that your trade secrets shall remain secret, even if the agreement with the contractor ends sooner than expected.

What cannot be forgotten is that the legal presumption that work of authorship under employment is in the employer’s ownership, only applies to employees in terms of regulations in the field of labor law.

However, contractors are not encompassed by that rule, so it is crucial that in the agreement, you unambiguously state that everything the contractor creates based on the agreement with the client is in the client’s full ownership.

As much as hiring an independent contractor sounds tempting because of the numerous advantages in comparison to the establishment of a traditional employment relationship, this type of business relationship can be a double-edged sword. It is easy to conclude that even the smallest incautiousness when regulating important matters, can lead to catastrophic consequences. It is exactly the lack of strict legal regulation in the relationship between the company and the independent contractor, that causes the need for caution of the company when entering this type of cooperation.

Thus, use all the advantages and possibilities your industry offers, but prior to that, don’t forget to take all necessary precautions in order to safely sail into business cooperation with your contractors, without worrying that you shall end up with the short end the stick. Since trade secrets certainly are your company’s greatest treasure, our advice is to stop confidential information from getting into the competitor’s hands and losing its value, by drafting an NDA.