EBITDA in M&A: What Buyers and Sellers Need to Know

Share
EBITDA in M&A: What Buyers and Sellers Need to Know

When a business owner starts thinking about selling, one of the first questions is what the real value of the company is. EBITDA is the metric buyers most often use as the starting point for that valuation, and the EBITDA multiple determines how much they are willing to pay for it. Below we explain what EBITDA means, how it differs from EBIT, and why the multiple is rarely a one-size-fits-all figure.

4x to 5xThe “standard” EBITDA multiple often repeated in textbooks and casual conversation. It is only a market average: where a business actually sits on the curve depends on its industry, growth prospects and risk profile.

What does EBITDA mean?

TL;DR: EBITDA stands for Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortisation. It is one of the main numbers dealmakers use to value a company in a sale of shares, merger, acquisition or investment, because it shows what the business earns from its operations before financing, tax and asset-related charges. It lets owners see the business the way a buyer or investor will.

EBITDA (short for Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortisation) is one of the go-to numbers dealmakers reach for when a company is being valued for a sale of shares, merger, acquisition, or investment.

Why is EBITDA so important for M&A?

TL;DR: EBITDA matters in M&A because it strips out financing, tax position and non-cash accounting charges, giving buyers a comparable baseline across companies and industries. It is not a perfect proxy for cash, since it ignores reinvestment such as capital expenditure, but it has become the default starting point for valuation, ahead of revenue or cash flow based measures.

EBITDA strips out factors that can blur the underlying performance of the business (like how it’s financed, its tax position, or non-cash accounting charges) and creates a more comparable “apples-to-apples” baseline across companies and industries.

EBITDA is not spelt out in statutory accounts, which your accountant will provide you in the ordinary course of work, where operating profit is more common. However, it’s not difficult to work it out: start with operating profit and add back depreciation and amortisation, then factor in interest and tax so you arrive at a clearer view of earnings from core operations.

To that extent, it is an objective baseline and has become the default method of arriving at value ahead of other measures, such as those based on revenue or cash flow.

It is important to stress that it is not a perfect proxy for cash, because EBITDA reflects what the business generates before it reinvests in things like capital expenditure or new initiatives. Even so, it serves as a helpful reference point for buyers.

For example, if a business reports £2.5 million of EBITDA, a buyer might view that as an indicator of the business’s ability to generate around £2.5 million a year in steady-state cash over the long term, before allowing for the ongoing spend on capex, upgrades, and other reinvestment needed to maintain and grow the operation.

For any business planning to sell or attract investment, calculating EBITDA is therefore a valuable exercise. It allows owners to view the business through the eyes of a prospective buyer or investor.

What is the difference between EBITDA and EBIT?

TL;DR: Both EBIT and EBITDA assess the profitability of core operations, but they differ in how much of the cost structure they capture. EBIT deducts depreciation and amortisation from profit, while EBITDA adds those items back, which highlights the cash-generating potential of day-to-day operations. Most transactions nevertheless use EBITDA as the relevant value.

Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) is a widely used measure of a company’s operating profitability. As the name implies, it shows profit before the impact of financing costs and taxation. While interest and taxes are very real cash expenses, they don’t arise from the day-to-day trading of the business itself. By removing these items, EBIT helps isolate how well the core operations are performing, independent of how the business is funded or where it sits in the tax system.

Both EBIT and EBITDA are used to assess the profitability of a company’s core operations, but they differ in how much of the cost structure they capture. EBIT deducts depreciation and amortisation from profit, while EBITDA adds these items back. Although depreciation and amortisation are non-cash expenses, they relate to the wear, tear, or consumption of the company’s assets over time. As a result, EBIT reflects operating profitability after recognising these asset-related costs, whereas EBITDA focuses more narrowly on earnings generated before such charges, highlighting the cash-generating potential of the business from its day-to-day operations.

Nevertheless, most transactions will use EBITDA as the relevant value.

When does a seller need to know their EBITDA?

TL;DR: A seller needs to know their EBITDA right at the outset of the sale process. Working it out early lets the owner see the business the way a prospective buyer or investor will, and avoids surprises when the valuation is built on EBITDA, and especially adjusted EBITDA, rather than on the operating profit the owner is used to.

It’s a concept that any seller needs to get to grips with and properly understand right at the outset of the process.

What does adjusted EBITDA mean?

TL;DR: Adjusted EBITDA normalises owner-specific items that a buyer would not expect to continue after the sale, such as higher owner drawings, the split between salary and dividends, above or below market rent on owner-connected property, or friendly pricing from connected-party suppliers. The aim is a figure that reflects how the business is likely to perform under new ownership.

For many owners who have always measured performance using operating profit, a valuation based on EBITDA (and especially adjusted EBITDA) can be a bit of an eye-opener. The most common examples revolve around owner-managed “flexibility” that may not continue after a sale or investment.

For example, an owner might legitimately take higher drawings or split income between salary and dividends. That’s perfectly normal in an owner-managed business, but it may not reflect the cost structure a buyer expects post-deal, particularly if the owner steps back or remuneration is put onto a more formal, market-based footing. In those circumstances, adjusting EBITDA to reflect a sustainable, forward-looking position is often entirely reasonable.

The same logic applies elsewhere: rent may be set above or below market level where the property is owned by the business owner (or a connected person), or the business may benefit from “friendly” pricing from connected-party suppliers. Adjusted EBITDA is designed to identify and normalise these kinds of items, so the figure better reflects how the business is likely to perform under new ownership.

In the experience of our M&A team, most SME owners will have at least some costs running through the business, which may be modest or more significant. It’s their company, after all, and they often have the flexibility to structure things in a way that suits them. The important point in a sale is that a buyer will usually assume some of those owner-specific costs won’t continue once the business changes hands. That said, under today’s tax regime, it’s increasingly common for sellers to use various approaches to how they pay themselves to achieve tax optimisation.

Significance of EBITDA in distressed M&A

TL;DR: In distressed M&A, EBITDA still matters but must be treated with caution. Distressed businesses often show weak, volatile or negative EBITDA because of excessive debt, liquidity pressure or one-off shocks, so buyers look at what the business could generate once the distress is removed. EBITDA is one tool among many and has to be combined with analysis of liquidity, capital expenditure needs and post-completion stabilisation.

In distressed M&A, EBITDA still plays an important role, but it has to be treated with caution.

Distressed businesses often show weak, volatile, or even negative EBITDA, usually because they are burdened by excessive debt, short-term liquidity pressure, or one-off shocks rather than a fundamentally broken operating model. Buyers, therefore, look beyond EBITDA headlines to understand what the business could generate once the distress is removed. For example, after a debt restructure, cost rationalisation, or disposal of loss-making divisions.

Therefore, EBITDA is best viewed as one tool among many: useful for understanding underlying operating potential, but only when combined with a clear analysis of liquidity, capital expenditure needs, and the steps required to stabilise the business after completion.

The next step after understanding EBITDA: Applying Multiples

TL;DR: There is no universal EBITDA multiple. The “standard” of four or five times is only a rough market average, and where a business sits on the curve depends on its industry and sector. A multiple reflects how much a buyer will pay today for future earnings, shaped by growth prospects, risk profile and how sustainable and scalable those earnings are perceived to be.

One of the first questions business owners ask when thinking about a sale is a simple one: “What multiple will my business achieve?” It’s an understandable question, but also one that rarely has a simple answer.

There’s a long-standing myth, often repeated in textbooks and casual conversations, that there is a “standard” EBITDA multiple: usually four or five times. Like many myths, there’s a grain of truth in it. If you look across the market, you might see an average emerge around that level.

But averages can be misleading. A more helpful way to think about multiples is as a bell curve: some businesses sit at the lower end, many cluster around the middle, and others achieve significantly higher multiples. Where a business falls on that curve depends heavily on its industry and sector.

At its core, an EBITDA multiple reflects how much a buyer is willing to pay today for a stream of future earnings. In some industries, a buyer may be comfortable paying the equivalent of five years’ worth of EBITDA because cash flows are steady, predictable, and the risks are well understood. In other sectors, the same buyer might see far greater upside and be prepared to pay far more for it.

Take, for example, a software business with strong IP and genuine economies of scale. If that intellectual property can generate recurring revenues for 15 or 20 years, and growth can be delivered without costs rising at the same pace, a buyer may be willing to pay a multiple well above the market average in tech M&A. In that context, the multiple reflects future upside, the durability of earnings, and strategic value, rather than simply what the business has achieved historically.

The key takeaway is that EBITDA multiples are not universal. They are shaped by sector dynamics, growth prospects, risk profile, and how sustainable and scalable the earnings are perceived to be. Understanding where your business sits within its industry, and how buyers in that sector think about value, is far more important than chasing a headline “magic number.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is EBITDA in M&A?

EBITDA is Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortisation, and dealmakers use it as a baseline when valuing a company. It strips out how the business is financed, its tax position and non-cash accounting charges, which makes companies and industries comparable. For the wider deal context, see our guide to mergers and acquisitions in Serbia.

What is the difference between EBITDA and EBIT?

EBIT deducts depreciation and amortisation from profit, while EBITDA adds these items back. Both assess the profitability of core operations, but EBITDA focuses on earnings before asset-related charges and so highlights cash-generating potential. Most transactions use EBITDA as the relevant value, including when you sell shares in a Serbian company.

What is adjusted EBITDA?

Adjusted EBITDA is EBITDA normalised for owner-specific costs that a buyer expects to stop after the sale. Typical examples are higher owner drawings, the split between salary and dividends, above or below market rent on property owned by the owner, and friendly pricing from connected-party suppliers. It is worked out early in a share purchase process in Serbia so that the figure reflects how the business will perform under new ownership.

Is EBITDA useful when valuing a distressed company?

Yes, but only with caution. Distressed businesses often show weak, volatile or negative EBITDA because of debt, liquidity pressure or one-off shocks, so buyers look at what the business could generate once the distress is removed. The figure has to be combined with analysis of liquidity and capital expenditure needs, as explained in our overview of distressed M&A.

Is there a standard EBITDA multiple?

No. The idea of a “standard” multiple of four or five times is a myth with a grain of truth: it reflects a market average, but averages can be misleading. Multiples depend on sector dynamics, growth prospects, risk profile and how sustainable and scalable the earnings are, which is why a software business with strong IP can command far more in tech M&A.

When should a seller work out their EBITDA?

Right at the outset of the sale process. Owners who have always measured performance using operating profit are often surprised by a valuation based on EBITDA, especially adjusted EBITDA. The same exercise is useful for any business planning to attract investment, because it shows the business through the eyes of a prospective investor.

EBITDA gives a buyer a starting point and lets a seller see the business through the buyer’s eyes, but the figure that ends up in the price depends on the adjustments, the sector and the structure of the deal. If you are preparing to sell a company, buy one or bring in an investor, contact our M&A team to discuss how your numbers will be read at the negotiating table.

Reviewed by: Vitomir Žunić, Managing Partner · View profile

Updated by: Kristina Jevtić, Of Counsel · View profile

Related people


Tijana Žunić Marić

Tijana Žunić MarićAdvokat

Attorney at Law

View full profile
Add Zunic Law as a preferred source on Google
Newsletter

Learn legal updates, and what to do about them

Legal developments in Serbia and the EU, each with the step it asks of your business.

Sign up

Two emails a month. Unsubscribe any time.